See, after the Trump Administration took over for the 2nd term, they’re being called out in a lot of lawsuits in the United States, some are just targeting them by the blue party, and some are valid. The same thing we’re seeing with a lawsuit involving a big law firm in the country, and yes, we’re talking about Perkins Coie, which has sued the Trump administration. Why? Well, recently, Trump actually signed a new rule which was targeting law firms that were biased when it comes to the Democratic party, and sure enough, since it has been record of Perkins Coie that they’re kinda biased with the Democratic party in the country, the law firm just jumped onto the scene and tried to block this rule by filing this lawsuit. Though in the courtroom, back and forth, we saw the Perkins Coie Lawsuit Judge Recusal. And if you don’t know what is going on recently with this case, then just keep on reading.
Why Did the Trump Team Want the Judge Out?
Well, when this case ended up in court, we saw that Judge Beryl Howell (who was hearing this case) issued a temporary order to block this new rule. But right away, we saw that the Department of Justice stepped into this case right after that. But why? Well, it turns out, Judge Howell has had some incidents or cases in the past where she was particularly going against Trump, and it showed that she was biased against the Trump Administration. Like, in the past, she has said and made comments against the Trump administration, so it could very well be that she has issued that order to block Trump’s new rule regarding law firms because she just doesn’t like the current administration.
All in all, so far, the DOJ basically argued that Judge Howell couldn’t possibly be fair in this case, and it just really shows through her actions, words and comments in the past.
Judge Howell Wasn’t Having It
Sure enough, when the DOJ intervened in this case, Judge Howell strongly pushed back, saying that there is no need to attack her personally in this case. And that, too, she claims that there are no real legal reasons behind that as well.
In her defence, she has said that it is actually totally normal for a judge to question the actions of the current government and that she hasn’t done anything wrong or shown any biases. She has kinda backfired on the DOJ as well, like, she is saying that they’re focusing on her character rather than looking at whether the new rule signed by Trump was fair/legal or not. This isn’t the only case where government action has triggered strong legal resistance—just look at the PepsiCo FTC Lawsuit, where federal regulators revived an old law to hold a corporate giant accountable for unfair practices.
Things Are Getting Personal (And Political)
The thing is, it has been a big talking point in the country about whether the judges who are sitting in courts are showing biases to one party or the other. And sure enough, there is a political divide here as well, like the people who support Trump say that there are many judges who are biased towards the Democratic party, and it has been shown through their decisions, their words and comments in the past, that too, over and over again. The people who support these judges or are somewhat left-leaning say that the Trump administration and his supporters are just trying to put unnecessary pressure on the judges, which is not fair.
Related Articles :
- OPM Mass Firings Lawsuit Ruling
- Ohio Pandemic Unemployment Benefits Lawsuit
- McDonald’s Hispanic Heritage Lawsuit
- Jason Arrington Lawsuit
Read related cases in our Other Major Lawsuits & Disputes section.
