Dapper Labs, the creator of the highly successful NBA Top Shot NFT collectibles, will pay $4 million to resolve a class-action lawsuit that accused the company of selling unregistered securities through its NFTs. The resolution marks a pivotal moment for the NFT industry as regulators increasingly scrutinize whether these digital assets should fall under securities laws.
The lawsuit, originally filed in 2021, claimed that Dapper Labs violated U.S. securities regulations by selling NFTs without proper registration. At the heart of the case was whether NBA Top Shot Moments tokenized video highlights of basketball plays qualified as investment contracts under the Howey Test. Plaintiffs argued that Dapper Labs exercised significant control over the ecosystem by operating the exclusive Top Shot marketplace on its proprietary Flow Blockchain, limiting user’s ability to trade NFTs elsewhere. This centralized structure, they contended, created an expectation of profits derived from the company’s efforts, a key criterion for classifying an asset as a security.
Key Settlement Terms and Company Response
As part of the settlement agreement, Dapper Labs has agreed to adopt enhanced compliance protocols, which will require annual employee training on federal securities regulations. Notably, the company also pledged to accelerate decentralization efforts for its Flow Blockchain, reducing its direct oversight of NFT transactions, a move likely aimed at mitigating future legal risks.
Despite agreeing to the settlement, Dapper Labs maintained its stance that NBA Top Shot Moments were never intended as financial investments. CEO Roham Gharegozlou compared the NFTs to physical trading cards, emphasizing their role as fan collectibles rather than speculative instruments. “These are digital memorabilia first and foremost,” Gharegozlou stated, distancing the product from traditional securities.
Broader Implications for the NFT Market
The case could have far-reaching consequences for the NFT industry. If courts increasingly interpret certain NFTs as securities, companies may face heightened regulatory burdens, including registration requirements and stricter disclosure rules. Legal experts suggest the settlement could prompt other NFT platforms to reevaluate their business models, particularly those with centralized marketplaces or promises of appreciation.
Sarah Brennan, a blockchain legal expert, stated, “This resolution demonstrates the unclear regulatory landscape for NFTs and crypto assets. “As the industry matures, we’ll likely see more clarity either through court rulings or new legislation on how NFTs should be classified and regulated.”
Parallel Case: FBI Wrongful Raid Lawsuit Reaches Supreme Court
In an unrelated but thematically similar legal battle, the U.S. Supreme Court is set to review a case involving an Atlanta family traumatized by an FBI wrong-door raid in 2017. Agents stormed Trina Martin and Toi Cliatt’s home at dawn, and guns were drawn while searching for a gang member who no longer lived there. The family’s lawsuit seeking damages was initially dismissed under the “discretionary function” exception, which shields federal employees from liability for certain operational decisions.
The Supreme Court’s decision could redefine accountability standards for law enforcement, determining whether citizens can sue the government over traumatic mistaken raids. Civil rights advocates argue that without such recourse, agencies face little consequence for harmful errors.
Related Articles :
- Four Lakes Task Force assessments lawsuit
- Wrongful FBI Raid: A Family’s Quest for Justice
- DOGE USIP Tro Lawsuit Ruling: Overview and Latest Developments
- Listeria Ice cream Lawsuit
Read related cases in our Other Major Lawsuits & Disputes section.
